Sunday, 22 September 2019

Blog Post #2 - Week 3


Hi everyone! Welcome back to my math blog and my second ever blog post! This post (and each of the ones that follow it!) will contain some of my reflections, thoughts, and reactions to course content be it lectures, readings, videos we’ve watched, and more! I will use this space to really express what I’ve learned so far and how I feel about it! With that being said, let’s get started!!

One of the most important and impactful things we discussed in class this week is that there is no such thing as a “math brain” or “not having a math brain”. This is a discourse that is unfortunately so prevalent in our society and in our schools. I can recall so many of my classmates who refused to put in their full effort in math because “they just weren’t made for it” and worse yet teachers who wouldn’t believe in students or push them to succeed once again because they felt that math just wasn’t their strong suit. The discourse goes the other way too and being a student who succeeded at math, I remember peers discrediting the effort I would put in because they felt I was “just made to do math”. As our conversations in class concluded, these discourses are harmful to students because they truly limit their chances of success and reduces the outcome of possibilities they have in life. Instead of believing in this “math brain” illusion, we as future educators need to approach math with a growth mindset and do our best to instil it in all our students. That is, we need to encourage our students that they CAN do math, they CAN problem solve, and they CAN overcome challenges if they are prepared to embrace them and view them as an opportunity for growth and improvement.  

Here’s a short video that explains growth mindset by contrasting it with fixed mindset which is where thoughts like “not having a math brain” originate.


Another valuable discussion that we had in class this week was around the idea that we shouldn’t be afraid to make mistakes in front of our students, to admit to them that we don’t always have the answer right away, or to let them know that we are learning alongside them. I think this can go a long way in helping to establish positive relationships with students. Being open and honest with them allows them to see you as human and more likely to trust you, in my opinion. I know personally, I always connected and learned best under teachers who were transparent with me. The other key takeaway for me was that when you make mistakes in front of your students and are honest about it, it models for them that making mistakes is okay and that they are opportunities for growth. By seeing teachers make mistakes and approach them with a growth mindset I think it is more likely that students will experience less anxiety when they make mistakes of their own and even begin to adopt a growth mindset of their own!

I am excited to keep learning in this course and I am confident that my development as a future math educator will continue. Thanks for reading!

Monday, 9 September 2019

Introductory Blog Post


Hi everyone in 8P29! This is my introductory blog post so I figured I would share a little bit about myself and then start discussing the two blogs I read from http://www.learningscientists.org/archive/ and why I chose them! To start with some background, I am 22 years old and am from Aurora, Ontario which is about an hour north of Toronto. I am an only child, so I grew up there with just my parents as immediate family. I was in French Immersion for elementary and high school which led me to choose French as my teachable here at Brock. I am in the concurrent education program in the junior/intermediate stream, so this is my 5th year at Brock. I live off campus in a house with 5 of my friends and they are all in the teacher education program as well. In addition to teaching, I am most passionate about sports especially tennis, basketball, football, and soccer. I taught at a tennis camp in Aurora for 6 summers and was on Brock’s tennis team for some time during my undergrad. My favourite professional tennis player is Fabio Fognini. I coached basketball for 2 years while I was in high school and I love catching Raptors games on tv. I am a very very very passionate supporter of the LA Rams (NFL) and AS Roma (soccer, Serie A) so my Sunday’s are usually full of me watching their matches. I also referee soccer during the summer which keeps me very involved in the sport. This is my first experience with writing or even reading blogs, so I hope to learn much more about it all as this course goes on!


Marcello Leone. Passion Cloud. WordArt. Accessed September 10, 2019. https://wordart.com/ 


The first blog I chose to read for this week was titled “Manipulatives – Why They Can Hinder Learning and What You Can Do About It” by Sara Fulmer. It can be found at the following link: https://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2017/4/4-1 . This blog post really intrigued me because teachers often turn to manipulatives as a learning tool to help students in math and I also often used manipulatives when I was tutoring students in math at the Brock Learning Lab. In many of my experiences though, I found that the manipulatives did not serve their intended purpose and only helped distract students. These experiences are what influenced me to read this blog and I found the content very interesting. Some of the main points from the post were that manipulatives that are too visually interesting can increase off-task behaviour and that constantly using manipulatives in class can make students too reliant on them. I still believe manipulatives can be useful, but I will try to use them sparingly and give real thought to the type of manipulative I use.

The second blog post I read is “Rethinking Teacher Training – How Mathematics and Education Departments Can Help” by Bryan Penfound at https://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2016/4/19-1 . This blog post caught my eye because we, of course, are in a teacher education program! Bryan suggests that teacher candidates take a course that covers the grade specific curriculum content they will be teaching and another course on the pedagogy of math such as how to sequence mathematical ideas etc. While Bryan’s suggestions seem a little different to how we are learning Math at Brock, I am sure they both have strengths and that they would both produce very strong teacher candidates!

Thanks for reading!